TransLink looks at higher prices for park-and-ride lots……..When idiots run the show, don’t be surprized………..

Didn’t take long for TransLink to make another cash grab from transit customers. Forgetting that ParkAi??& Rides are supposed to attract customers that would otherwise not take a bus or live to far from convenient transit, TransLink’s bureaucrats continue to blunder on and on with ideas that will only deter ridership.

Tis a very small world TransLink lives in and until TransLink’s bureaucrats are willing to give up their very generous monthly car allowances and other perks and told they must use the transit system as part of their employment contract, little should be heard from them. In fact, we could rid ourselves of TransLink all together and not hinder the transit service one iota. How’s that for saving money!

Just a note, the TransLink Park and ride at the South Delta Exchange is just the parking lot at the South Delta Recreation Centre and it would be very hard indeed to charge for Park & Ride parking.

TransLink looks at higher prices for park-and-ride lots

By Kelly Sinoski, Vancouver SunJune 21, 2012

TransLink is considering charging parking fees at some of its free park-and-ride lots ai??i?? or raising the price at others ai??i??to encourage people to take transit to SkyTrain stations or bus loops instead of driving to them.

The idea, part of a study to determine how the regionai??i??s 19 park-and-ride lots can more efficiently feed into the transit network, could see prices at some lots jump substantially.

TransLink spokesman Jason Martin said no decisions on pricing have yet been made, but acknowledged TransLink could potentially partner with more parking companies, such as Impark, which now charges commuters $6 per day to park at Surreyai??i??s King George SkyTrain station.

By comparison, the South Surrey park-and-ride lot is free, while the Scott Road park-and-ride charges commuters $3 per day. Richmondai??i??s Bridgeport station, which has a partnership with the River Rock Casino, charges $2.50 per day.

ai???Weai??i??re going to look at our strategy overall for park-and-rides,ai??? Martin said, adding there will likely continue to be a range of pricing and partnerships across the regionai??i??s park-and-ride lots.

Charging more at the lots may encourage people to take buses to SkyTrain stations or connecting bus loops, instead of driving to them, he said.

ai???Pricing may be the most efficient way to control demand. If a park-and-ride lot is free we might not be creating the right incentives for people to consider using transit in those areas.ai???

Meanwhile, TransLink is cracking down on illegal parking at the South Surrey park-and-ride, where overcrowding has prompted some drivers to park at curbs, double park, block other cars or park in such a way that prevents buses being able to manoeuvre.

TransLink has had a tow truck on the lot during this weekai??i??s morning rush hours to warn drivers that it will begin towing cars next week.

Martin said the overflow is happening even though the lot was reconfigured recently to increase the parking spaces from 425 to 481.

Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts said the South Surrey park-and-ride has been over-capacity for the past five years, with little being done to improve the problem.

And while she supports getting people out of their cars and onto transit, she doesnai??i??t believe commuters south of the Fraser should be penalized with higher fees because they donai??i??t have the same transit infrastructure as some cities like Vancouver and Burnaby.

ai???All the park-and-rides are busy. When you have a car-dependent community because of lack of transit, you want to do everything you can to encourage people getting out of their cars and taking transit when they can,ai??? Watts said. ai???Until you have an integrated transportation system you can rely on, I donai??i??t think fees should be in place.ai???

Martin said the study, which is expected to be completed within the next six months, will look at where commuters are coming from and where they are parking to develop a strategy that complements the existing transit service.

It may be that some underserved areas need cheaper access to park-and-ride lots, he said, while the prices could increase at lots in transit-dense areas where people live closer to SkyTrain. Martin would not confirm whether TransLink is considering closing certain lots.

He said the increase in traffic at park- and-ride lots is a result of more people taking transit, including those who are catching buses from South Surrey or Ladner and connecting with the Canada Line at Bridgeport.

But he noted it costs TransLink $3,000 to create each parking space and $200 per year to operate it.

ai???Itai??i??s positive people are taking transit but we have to look at what are the value or the cost of park-and-rides,ai??? he said. ai???We understand park-and-rides offer a convenience for customers but it comes at a price.

ai???Itai??i??s a matter of balancing how transit can support park- and-rides but park-and-rides themselves are not an overall solution.ai???

Coquitlam Mayor Richard Stewart said that if transit is made ai???inconvenient enough,ai??? people will continue to drive.

Fees are charged at all West Coast Express station park-and-rides. But park-and-rides at Gleneagles, Westmount, Park Royal mall, Phibbs exchange, Sexsmith, Walnut Grove, Ladner exchange and south Delta exchange are all free.

ksinoski@vancouversun.com

Comments

One Response to “TransLink looks at higher prices for park-and-ride lots……..When idiots run the show, don’t be surprized………..”
  1. eric chris says:

    SkyTrain by TransLink is overloaded and can’t handle any more passengers; this is due to far too much development along SkyTrain lines.

    By charging for park and ride, TransLink is really hoping to reduce demand on the SkyTrain network. TransLink is encouraging drivers who currently use “park and ride” near SkyTrain stations – to just drive all the way, instead.

    If the buffoons at TransLink admitted this, they would be hanging from a high tree.

    If you read the study by Steer Davies Gleave and SNCL (transportation consultants) on the Expo Line – it is obvious that SkyTrain is over loaded and in a state of severe decline:

    http://www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/bpotp/rapid_transit_projects/expo%20line%20upgrade%20strategy/expo%20line%20upgrade%20strategy%20%20project%20summary.ashx

    Kelly Sinoski is all too willing to report on anything that TransLink throws her way and is misleading readers, once more, about the real motive for TransLink wanting to charge park and ride users – it is for TransLink to reduce the number of transit users “who have cars”.

    For TransLink whose annual budget for transit is about $1.2 billion, park and ride isn’t a huge expense.

    Kelly Sinosiki is nothing more than a stooge for TransLink. If she were an ethical reporter, she would be writing about how it would be smarter to let SkyTrain wind-down without wasting any more money on it.

    She would be writing that the glorified monkeys at TransLink have to be replaced with engineers building tram and LRT lines to save transit – to make transit more affordable, accessible and extensive.

    She would be telling everyone to cut our losses and to fire the corrupt-inept accountants and economists who are earning exorbitant salaries to run the TransLink monkey show.

    However, Vancouver Sun reporter Kelly Sinoski has sold out to TransLink and can only write what TransLink tells her to write or face retribution from her Vancouver Sun employer who has a vested interest (advertising money from TransLink) in writing what TransLink wants readers to read $$.

    Want the truth? The architects of TransLink and their developer friends building condos along SkyTrain lines for huge profits are simply stringing taxpayers along for as long as they can “to make as much money as they can” before SkyTrain implodes and the axe falls on them.

    http://www.rockantenne.de/webplayer/?playchannel=alternative

    ec