Et tu Brute is a Latin phrase meaning “and you, Brutus?“, “even you, Brutus?” or “you too, Brutus?“, purportedly the last words of the Roman dictator Julius Caesar to his friend Marcus Brutus at the moment of his assassination. The quotation is widely used to signify the utmost unexpected betrayal by a person, such as a friend.
The choice to have Vancouver Vision Councillor Geoff Meggs to be incoming Premier Horgan’s chief of staff is a massive mistake and will cause an election by fall.
Geoff Meggs has played fast and lose with the truth concerning LRT and the proposed $3 billion Broadway SkyTrain Subway and he is unsuitable for any post within the NDP.
It is sad to see that the NDP have learned nothing about transit and remembered nothing about transit and still see it as a massive pork barrel for which to play.
The NDP are now firmly in the pocket of land developers, speculators AND SNC Lavalin, who happen to own the engineering patents for the proprietary ART railway (SkyTrain), with Meggs appointment.
The next election, spring of 2018, with the NDP losing badly, mainly by Megg’s questionable ethics!
Could it not get worse for BC taxpayers and transit customers.
Memo for Carole James: Meggs knows very little about Metro Vancouver, except how to enrich land speculators and land developers. You should have retired.
Vancouver Councillor Geoff Meggs to be John Horganai??i??s chief of staff
Geoff Meggs is a three-term Vancouver city councillor.
Three-term Vancouver City Councillor Geoff Meggs has resigned in order to take a job as Premier-designate John Horganai??i??s chief of staff.
Meggs was first elected to city council in 2008.
ai???WhenAi?? the [premier-designate] calls you and says Iai??i??d like you to work on the agenda that I ran on which included making B.C. more affordable, improving the province in so many ways ai??i?? itai??i??s very hard to say no,ai??? Meggs said of the transition.
MLA Carol James, who speaks for the transition team, said the former councillorai??i??s intimate knowledge of Metro Vancouver was a key asset.
ai???Having that mix is critical, no question.ai???
In the wake of the announcement, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson issued a statement, thanking Meggs for his time on council.
ai???We have been fortunate to have Geoff Meggs on City Council over the last nine years, where he has been an effective and thoughtful City Councillor, demonstrating strong leadership on issues like affordable housing and transit,ai??? Robertson wrote, calling Meggs ai???immensely qualifiedai??? to serve as Horganai??i??s chief of staff.
It wonai??i??t be Meggsai??i?? first time inside the premierai??i??s office. He previously served as communications director in the office of former NDP Premier Glen Clark.
He has also served as executive director to the BC Federation of Labour.
The BC NDP made the announcement Tuesday, also revealing to other hires to key positions in Horganai??i??s inner circle.
NDP campaign director Bob Dewar, who had served as Horganai??i??s chief of staff in opposition, will stay on as special advisor to the premier.
And Don Wright willAi??serve as Deputy Minister of Executive Council, Cabinet Secretary, and Head of the Public Service, replacing Kim Henderson who has been let go.
Wright was BCIT president until he left to be Deputy Minister to Adrian Dix in 2013. When the NDP lost that election, he moved on to become CEO of Central One Credit union, a position he will resign on Friday.
Byelection imminent
A spokesperson for the Vancouver Mayorsai??i?? office said Meggsai??i?? exit will trigger a byelection for his council seat.
His departure will also leave big shoes to fill on council, said city hall watcher Mike Klassen, who notedAi??Meggs was often the spokesperson for Vision Vancouver when the mayor wasnai??i??t available.
ai???You know, the joke about Geoff was that he was the guy who would always do the media when there was bad news.ai???
Klassen added that Meggs was also the person who started the discussion about the removal of the viaducts.
ai???I think we remember Mayor Robertson asking for funding for that and it seems to me quite possible that the province will kick in for some of the removing of those viaducts that will cost a lot of money.ai???
But NPA Councillor and former colleague George Affleck says he doesnai??i??t expect having Meggs in the premierai??i??s office will change the cityai??i??s relationship with Victoria.
ai???Iai??i??m not sure if he would be allowed to have preferential treatment given to Vancouver, heai??i??s going to have a lot of things on his plate,ai??? Affleck said.
Despite Meggsai??i?? departure, Vision Vancouver will retain its majority on Vancouverai??i??s city council.
-With files from Liza Yuzda and Janet Brown
Ai??Ai??2017Ai??Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
There is a plan in place, which has received international recognition, that could once again see an affordable passenger rail service from Vancouver, through the Fraser Valley to Chilliwack..
The Leewood Study has been ignored by most politicians, but not all and the time is right to put shovel to ground as regional traffic congestion in the Fraser Valley has become endemic and relief is needed.
Do not listen to the SkyTrain Lobby, as the aging gadgetbahnen is becoming extremely expensive to operate and maintain. No one has bought an ALRT/ART transit system in over a decade as it is too expensive not only to build, but to operate and maintain.
Do not listen to the light-metro lobby, as huge construction costs ($130 mil/km) make it unsustainable. Also, being elevated has not proven to be an advantage over at-grade LRT, in fact the opposite is true as at-grade transit is easier and cheaper to maintain and operate.
Do not listen to the subway lobby, as they live in a land of sparkle ponies and pixie dust. Subways are hugely expensive to build and hugely expensive to maintain, costing the operating authorities huge sums of tax money to operate. Due to their nature, subways do not attract ridership, in fact subways tend to deter ridership!
The former BC Liberal Government had absolutely no care for regional transit, except for building multi billion bridges and highways and has left good transportation planningAi?? to rot.
The Leewood Study even though seven years old, gives the region an affordable 21st century solution for transportation from downtown Vancouver to Chilliwack, connecting the population centres of Vancouver/Burnaby; North and South Surrey/Cloverdale; Langley; Abbotsford; and Chilliwack/Sardis.
Do not be left at the station with the baggage of unworkable or unaffordable solutions and board the train with a ticket for success!
The concept of freight trams has been around for a while, in fact the concept is quite old.
The success of Dresden’s freight tram was based on moving car components, via container, from one factory to another across the city. In St. Etienne, it’s the concept of moving smaller loads from one central distribution point outside the city centre to smaller ones inside the city, taking delivery trucks off congested roads.
Certainly in metro Vancouver, the concept of freight trams could find many good uses, from deliveries along Broadway to a fast “parcels” service from Chilliwack to Vancouver.
The ability for LRT to adapt to new situations, sadly, goes completely unrecognized by TransLink, regional politicians and the provincial government.
Thinking out of the box is just not comprehended by TransLink.
A French project to develop a concept for freight operations on light rail networks reached a milestone on the morning of June 13, when a tram was used to deliver merchandise to a retailer in St Etienne.
The trial delivery to the Casino store in Place Carnot was organized as part of the TramFret project, an initiative led by research and development institute Efficacity, which is being supported by St Etienne public transport operator Stas.
Special authorization was granted for the trial by STRMTG, the national agency responsible for tramway safety.
TramFret says the trial will enable it to optimize the system, begin industrial development of the concept, and study its sustainability.
If the first phase of the trial is successful further testing will be carried out in St Etienne in the coming weeks.
Well,Ai?? China’s miracle “straddling bus “; the bus that was going to solve urban transit woes with its revolutionary concept, has been deemed a scam!
Absolutely no surprise here.
What was sad to see and hear, was the number of politicians who got suckered by this. Anyone with a basic knowledge of transit operations would had called this bit of nonsense out, but no, they lauded it as revolutionary.
Since when scams become revolutionary?
I probably will not get an apology by the straddling bus crowd, even though they were very rude to me, including those in the mainstream media.
My only wish is the the MSM deal with real transit issues regionally and not ‘Tom Swift’ style transit fantasies.
Image copyright Photo by Imaginechina/REX/Shutterstock
It seemed like a glimpse into the city of tomorrow – but China’s “straddling bus” was riddled by doubts early on and now is headed for the scrap yard.
The futuristic idea was a bus that would drive above traffic, allowing other commuter cars to pass underneath.
The project was announced last summer to much acclaim but soon ran into feasibility and investment problems.
Many of China’s cities suffer from chronic traffic congestion so there’s a strong hunger for ingenious solutions.
The project faced strong headwinds from the very beginning and according to Chinese media, the test site is now being demolished entirely.
Reports are saying that workers have already begun dismantling and removing the test track in Qinhuangdao.
Image copyright Getty Images Image caption The TEB was to zoom above traffic, elevated 2 meters above the daily gridlock
The idea of a traffic-straddling bus first appeared in China in 2010, but it didn’t make much impact until the model was presented at the 2016 Beijing International High-Tech Expo.
The so-called Transit Elevated Bus was touted as a revolution in public ground transportation, able to glide over traffic, literally lifting commuters from the daily grind of being stuck in their cars for hours.
Yet only a few days after its much-lauded test-run in Qinhuangdao city, Hebei province, all test-runs had been halted and doubts began to emerge.
Many doubted the vehicle would be able to manage curves or fit under footbridges in Beijing, and critics have asked how it will turn corners, whether it is strong enough to bear its own and passengers’ weight and how long its battery would last.
There was also confusion about whether the project had ever been approved by the local authorities and there was even suspicion it could be an investment scam.
But the widespread interest in the idea did show that there’s an appetite for ideas that could help big cities out of the grip of the daily traffic gridlock – even if this one appears to have hit a final roadblock.
Endemic gridlock, despite a now over $10 billion investment in SkyTrain. Do the same thing again and again, hoping for different results is insane.
After driving into Vancouver yesterday, it has hit home that despite a now over $10 billion spent on SkyTrain light-metro and the Canada line, congestion is getting worse.
After being an advocate for better transportation in the region for now over thirty years, I am still amazed by the “SkyTrain ennui” that prevails in most Metro Vancouver city halls. It is like regional planners and engineers just looked at picture books, instead of reading and learning from recent transit studies published across the pond. The exception is that TransLink is very good at implementing new tax schemes to pay for their questionable transit planning.
In Delta, where I reside, there is much support for a $12 billion, ten lane mega bridge, in the vain hope that it will cure gridlock. It won’t of course because as in all cases, more traffic lanes lead to gridlock at the next choke point, which in this case is the Oak and Knight Street bridges.
Today, trying to get to the airport (YVR) took an extra 20 minutes because of massive congestion at the Oak St. Bridge, backing traffic to number 5 Road! Add three more lanes going to Richmond on a new bridge and the #5 Road interchange will be the next major choke point.
The BC Liberals have left us with a legacy of extremely bad transit planning, with the “White Elephant” Canada Line being the hallmark of Liberal transit incompetence.
The Canada Line, with only 40 metre long station platforms and the ability to operate only 2-car trains, has effectively about one half the capacity of the Expo and Millennium/Evergreen lines.
It is time for some serious talk about regional transit, which means a lot of toes are going to be stepped on.
The major problem to overcome is to stop planning for SkyTrain light-metro and LRT designed as SkyTrain light metro.
We have to think about economy and user friendliness and not capacity and speed. We have to think regionally and not the current multi billion dollar nonsense that passes for transit planning in the region today. We have to think of light rail; converting the Canada line to light-rail; operating light rail on the Arbutus Corridor; we have to think LRT on Broadway and not a SkyTrain subway, from BCIT in Burnaby to UBC and Stanley Park in Vancouver and from White Rock to Vancouver, along the King George in Surrey; we have to think TramTrain from Vancouver to Chilliwack; we have to think 21st century transit planning and not 1970’s transit planning where transit is put in the the air or underground so not to interfere with vehicular traffic.
It can be done, the question is; “do our civic and provincial politicians have the moral fortitude to do it?”
The following is well worthAi?? read as it compares the French Approach to Modern LRT and the American and Canadian rather dated approach to the transit mode.
As SkyTrain ages, its equipment deteriorates and today, a fire has happened and apparently not caused by a pyrotechnic birds nest.
As mentioned many times by Rail for the Valley, about $3 billion needs to be invested in the ART/ALRT SkyTrain lines to both renew the mini-metro system and to increase capacity.
As TransLink’s CEO and executives desperately try to hide the expensive truth from the public and regional mayors remain ignorant of the pricey needs of the SkyTrain light-metro system, system failures will become more and more common.And politicians want more expensive SkyTrain!
The great fear is a major catastrophe will happen on SkyTrain, just like the recent deadly Grenfell Tower inferno in London, where years of neglect had created a fiery death trap.
Ennui, combined with hubris, by politicians and bureaucrats is the cause of many a deadly fiasco.
Sunday morning SkyTrain service disrupted by New West ‘equipment fire’
Patrick Johnston (Vancouver Sun)
Published: June 17, 2017
Updated: June 18, 2017 1:49 PM
Filed Under:
The Province > News > Local News
Area around the New Westminster SkyTrain station in a file photo.Photo by Gerry Kahrmann
Travellers using the Expo Line Sunday morning are facing delays because of an ai???equipment fireai??? at New Westminster Station.
Shuttle buses are operating between Edmonds and Columbia station.
The fire is now out; a Translink spokesperson said just before 11 a.m. that service would return to normal ai???any time now.ai???
There was no risk to customers and no impact on the Millennium and Canada Lines.
As hydrogen fuel cell technology improves, the application for ‘rail’ transit is close to become a reality.
The main problem for hydrogen fuel cell transit is that the cell tends to produce power at a steady rate, but poor in providing power at times of high demand, like accelerating out of stations. This has made fuel cell technology quite good for submarines but poor for transit – until now.
There is still a long way to go for a light H (Hydrogen) MU vehicle in the testing stageAi?? and heavy rail commuter train locomotives, but I think the future will be with the hydrogen powered train.
This will be good news for our efforts for the return on the interurban and the return of passenger service on the E&N.
Alstom today successfully performed the first test run at 80 km/h of the worldai??i??s only fuel cell passenger train Coradia iLint on its own test track in Salzgitter, Lower Saxony (Germany). An extensive test campaign will be conducted in Germany and Czech Republic in the coming months before the Coradia iLint performs its first passenger test runs on the Buxtehudeai??i??BremervAi??rdeai??i??Bremerhavenai??i??Cuxhaven (Germany) route beginning of 2018.
The four-week test runs currently undergoing in Salzgitter aim at confirming the stability of the energy supply system based on coordinated interaction between the drive, the fuel cell and the battery of the vehicle. The braking power is also being tested to check the interface between the pneumatic and the electric brake.
The Coradia iLint is the first low floor passenger train worldwide powered by a hydrogen fuel cell, which produces electrical power for the traction. This zero-emission train is silent and only emits steam and condensed water. Coradia iLint is special for its combination of different innovative elements: a clean energy conversion, flexible energy storage in batteries, and a smart management of the traction power and available energy. Based on Alstomai??i??s flagship Coradia Lint diesel train, Coradia iLint is particularly suited for operation on non-electrified networks. It enables sustainable train operation while maintaining high train performance.
ai???This test run is a significant milestone in environmental protection and technical innovation. With the Coradia iLint and its fuel cell technology, Alstom is the first railway manufacturer to offer a zero-emission alternative for mass transit trains. Today our new traction system, so far successfully proved on the test ring, is used on a train for the first time ai??i?? a major step towards cleaner mobility in Europeai???, said Didier Pfleger, Vice President of Alstom Germany and Austria.
The dynamic tests are performed at Salzgitter plant at 80 km/h and in Velim (Czech Republic) at up to 140 km/h, the maximum speed of the Coradia iLint. For the purpose of the tests, a mobile filling station has been erected in Salzgitter to pump gaseous hydrogen into the pressure tank of the Coradia iLint. The hydrogen used for the test runs is the by-product of an industrial process, which is reasonably reused as a waste product. In the long term, Alstom aims to support the hydrogen production from wind energy.
The vehicle has already successfully completed the static commissioning process. All electrical and pneumatic functions of the trains have been tested and verified at standstill. TA?V SA?d has certified the safety of the battery, the pressure tank system and the fuel cell for the coming test phases.
The Coradia iLint was designed by Alstom teams in Germany at Salzgitterai??i??s site, centre of excellence for regional trains and in France notably in Tarbes, centre of excellence for traction systems and Ornans for the motors. This project benefits from the support of the German ministry of Transport and Digital infrastructure. Alstom has already signed letters of intent for 60 trains with the German states of Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-WA?rttemberg and the Hessian transport association ai???Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbundai??i??.
Ministry of Transportation to conduct feasibility study of hydrogen trains, which are silent and emit only steam and water, as part of GO electrification assessment.
The provincial government has decided to pursue potentially groundbreaking clean train technology as part of its plans to electrify the GO Transit network, the Star has learned.
At an announcement Thursday morning, the province is set to officially launch the long-awaited study and public consultation process on electrifying GO lines under its regional express rail (RER) program.
The Ontario Liberals say the $13.5-billion RER expansion will introduce all-day, two-way GO service on the busiest parts of the GTHAai??i??s regional rail network by 2025. The assessment of the programai??i??s environmental impacts is part of the government-mandated transit project assessment process (TPAP) that must be complete before the expansion can go ahead.
In an exclusive interview with the Star on Wednesday, Transportation Minister Steven Del Duca confirmed that in conjunction with the electrification assessment, the province will also launch a feasibility study of hydrogen-powered passenger trains.
Passenger trains powered by hydrogen fuel cellshave yet to enter regular service anywhere in the world, but early models have reached advanced testing phases in Europe. Manufacturers say the trains are nearly silent, and produce no emissions besides steam and condensed water.
The feasibility study will help determine whether hydrogen trains might be a better option for the RER program than traditional electric vehicles.
ai???This is a decision that weai??i??re making that will have to last for a generation and beyond, so we want to make sure that weai??i??re at the leading edge of the technology,ai??? said Del Duca.
ai???It could be traditional electrification, it could be electrification by hydrogen fuel cell. It could be a combination of both.ai???
It seems Montreal taxpayers are being taken for a $9 billion Bombardier ride, with the proposed 67 km Montreal light metro project.
The proposed Montreal LRT is not LRT at all, rather it is a light-metro, using the Bombardier Innovia body shell, using conventional ‘squirrel cage’ electric motors.
Based on the cost of now over $130 million/km for a Vancouver style, automaticAi?? ART light-metro, the cost for a 67 km network would be almost $9 billion.
Even if real LRT were to be built, the cost, based on Surrey’s LRT, of over $100 million/km would mean the 67 km network would cost almost $7 billion.
Thus, the project, based on 2017 construction costs in BC will be easily $1 billion to $3 billion over budget.
What is really happening is another Bombardier/Federal Liberal project that will turn into a multi billion dollar boondoggle, which the Montreal, Quebec and Canadian taxpayer will pay dearly for, just like Olympic Stadium and the infamous Mirabel airport.
When it comes to Quebec, money is no object and the bigger the “White Elephant” it seems, the better for the Federal Government.
Federal government expected to make announcement in Montreal Thursday
CBC News Posted: Jun 14, 2017 6:54 PM ET Last Updated: Jun 15, 2017 6:22 AM ET
The price tag for the line, which would link downtown Montreal with the South Shore and the West Island, has risen to $6 billion. (Caisse de dAi??pA?t et placement du QuAi??bec)
Montreal’s light-rail train project to get $1.3B from Ottawa
Federal government expected to make announcement in Montreal tomorrow
CBC NewsAi??Posted: Jun 14, 2017 6:54 PM ETAi??Last Updated: Jun 14, 2017 6:54 PM ET
Following months of negotiations, the federal government will unveil $1.3 billion in funding for Montreal’s light-rail project on Thursday,Ai??Radio-Canada has learned.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard, Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre and the head of theAi??Caisse de dAi??pA?t et placement du QuAi??bec,Ai??Michael Sabia,Ai??are expected to make the announcement in Montreal.
The decision comes a few months after the Trudeau government made no mention of funding the project in their spring budget, prompting concern from Couillard.
The price tagAi??for the 67-kilometre rail line (LRT), which would link downtown with the South Shore and the West Island, has risen to $6 billion in order to add more stations in the city’s downtown area.
Quebec has already committed around $1.3 billion to the project. The province’s pension fund manager, theAi??Caisse, has pledged close to $3 billion.
The LRT project now includes 27 stations. The first trains are expected to run in 2020.
TransLink has never estimated the costs associated with maintaining a subway.
I wanted to post this item, not to show problems with London’s proposed BRT, rather that cost of tunneling had been vastly under estimated on the subway portion of this project.
City hallai??i??s consultant, IBI Group, had dropped a bombshell on city officials that day: The tunnelai??i??s construction would now cost as much as $220 million ai??i?? 60 per cent above the initial upper limit, $135 million.
That $220 million figure, which stunned city officials, was soon made public. But sources say city officials believe the tunnel price tag could eventually have exceeded $300 million.
Again, the total BRT price tag, including the early tunnel estimate, was $560 million, with city hallai??i??s stake capped at $130 million and the rest needed from Ottawa and Queenai??i??s Park. If tunnel costs ballooned, itai??i??s unlikely Ottawa or the province would cover much of it ai??i?? meaning the local share would jump considerably.
There were a number of factors for the skyrocketing construction cost, sources say:
ai??i?? Conditions exist to turn beneath-downtown soil into a quicksand-like goo, potentially destabilizing old buildings.
ai??i?? Soil could be stabilized with chemicals, but thatai??i??s extremely costly.
ai??i?? Cost estimate for the underground station at Richmond/Oxford streets jumped.
ai??i?? Heating and ventilation prices went up, too
So, in short, city officials always knew the tunnel would be a challenging project. But now ai??i?? given the increased costs, and fears it could get even higher ai??i?? it looked irresponsible to some of them.
A 60% increase in the estimated cost of building a tunnel is stunning and I believe taxpayers in Metro Vancouver will have the same sort of “tunnel shock” with the proposed Broadway SkyTrain Subway, where early estimates of the project costing no more than $2 billion, will sky rocket past $3 billion!
But then, it doesn’t matter because the proposed Broadway subways has nothing to do about building better transit, rather it is a massive vanity project built to satisfy both the collective egos at Vancouver city hall and their political friends, the land speculators and land developers, with a transit project that will do nothing, except to give the impression that Vancouver is a world class city because it has a subway.
Recent Comments